|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Closed
Chrysler dealers to Challenge Obama's Eligibility Two lawyers, Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon, have Joined forces to assemble a case challenging in U.S. bankruptcy court the federal government's use of troubled Asset Relief Program funds to bailout Chrysler and in doing so may have caused a scenario that will bring to head the issueof Barack Obama's eligibiity to be president . To see thewhole story go to http://www.marchreport.com/20091210.html#2009-12-09-A01 |
| Is Obama Really Preparing For
Civil War? By Chuck Baldwin December 11, 2009 This column is archived at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20091211.html According to an obscure report in the European Union Times (EUTimes.net), "Russian Military Analysts are reporting to Prime Minister Putin that US President Barack Obama has issued an order to his Northern Command's (USNORTHCOM) top leader, US Air Force General Gene Renuart, to 'begin immediately' increasing his military forces to 1 million troops by January 30, 2010, in what these reports warn is an expected outbreak of civil war within the United States before the end of winter. "According to these reports, Obama has had over these past weeks 'numerous' meetings with his war council abut how best to manage the expected implosion of his Nation's banking system while at the same time attempting to keep the United States military hegemony over the World in what Russian Military Analysts state is a 'last ditch gambit' whose success is 'far from certain.'" The EU Times article continues by saying, "To the fears of Obama over the United States erupting into civil war once the full extent of the rape and pillaging of these peoples by their banks and government becomes known to them, grim evidence now shows the likelihood of this occurring much sooner than later." The Times story goes on to say that there are "over 220 million American people armed to the teeth and ready to explode." The Times article concludes by saying, "Though the coming civil war in the United States is being virtually ignored by their propaganda media, the same cannot be said of Russia, where leading Russian political analyst, Professor Igor Panarin has long warned that the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the US is heading for collapse." Many of us would be inclined to pooh-pooh such a story, but then there is this column from Bloomberg.com entitled "Arming Goldman With Pistols Against Public," written by Alice Schroeder. According to Ms Schroeder: "'I just wrote my first reference for a gun permit,' said a friend, who told me of swearing to the good character of a Goldman Sachs Group Inc. banker who applied to the local police for a permit to buy a pistol. The banker had told this friend of mine that senior Goldman people have loaded up on firearms and are now equipped to defend themselves if there is a populist uprising against the bank." There is no doubt that the American people have good reason to despise these international banksters epitomized by Goldman Sachs. Even one of Goldman's poster-boys, Henry Paulson, US Treasury secretary and former Goldman CEO, admitted that the American people were fed up. Schroeder quotes Paulson as saying, during testimony to Congress last summer, "[People] were unhappy with the big discrepancies in wealth, but they at least believed in the system and in some form of market-driven capitalism. But if we had a complete meltdown, it could lead to people questioning the basis of the system." Schroeder correctly opines, "There you have it. The bailout was meant to keep the curtain drawn on the way the rich make money, not from the free market, but from the lack of one. Goldman Sachs blew its cover when the firm's revenue from trading reached a record $27 billion in the first nine months of this year, and a public that was writhing in financial agony caught on that the profits earned on taxpayer capital were going to pay employee bonuses." Schroeder concludes her column by saying, "And if the proles [proletarit: plebs, working class, peasants] really do appear brandishing pitchforks at the doors of Park Avenue and the gates of Round Hill Road, you can be sure that the Goldman guys and their families will be holed up in their safe rooms with their firearms." So, do Wall Street and Russian analysts know something that we don't know? Is this why George W. Bush initiated USNORTHCOM to begin with? Is this why Barack Obama is beefing up USNORTHCOM? This would help explain the reports of all those potential detention camps that have been constructed (including the abandoned military installations that have refurbished security fences, guard towers, etc., around them). Has the American people's disgust with these crooks and thieves within the federal government and Wall Street reached a boiling point? There is no question that people are angry, and for good reason. The fraudulent financial policies of the Federal Reserve and its lackeys in the White House and Congress have literally bankrupted the country. Real unemployment is most likely over 20%. Taxes (along with costly fees, regulations, restrictions, penalties, mandates, etc.) at every level are going through the ceiling. America's jobs have been outsourced. Barack Obama continues G.W. Bush's irresponsibility, digging America deeper and deeper into foreign entanglements, at the cost of trillions of dollars and thousands of lives. The IRS continues to harass and harangue honest citizens, squeezing them like the proverbial turnip. And now, add the insanity of a global climate treaty being hammered out in Copenhagen, and a universal health care bill being rammed through Congress, and the outlook is even gloomier. I feel very comfortable in saying that the usurpations of power, the encroachments upon liberty, and the arrogant tax-and-spend policies emanating from Washington, D.C., and Wall Street these days are far more egregious than what George Washington and the boys were enduring in 1775-76 at the hands of the British Crown. There is no doubt in my mind that if Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Sam Adams were alive today, they would have given cause for the Goldman Sachs banksters to retreat to their bunkers years ago! The fact is, we do need a revolution! But not a revolution of anarchy and pitchforks. (The history of France should be ample evidence of the futility of this strategy.) We need a revolution of the individual states: to reclaim their sovereignty and fight for the liberties of their sovereigns (We the People). That is exactly what our forefathers did in '76. America's founding document (the Declaration of Independence) declares that our states are "free and independent." And so they are. We are not "one nation" with one all-powerful central government. We are a confederation of nation-states, united in a voluntary union, with each State reserving to itself the power and authority of self-determination, and ceding to the federal government limited, specifically delineated duties and limitations--limitations that have been totally ignored to the point that, for all intents and purposes, our once-great constitutional republic has been thoroughly expunged. Therefore, it is NOW time for the states to stand up to this meddlesome, every-growing tyranny that is known as Washington, D.C., and defend the rights and liberties of their citizens! What Dr. Ed Vieira (an attorney with 4 earned degrees from Harvard, who has successfully argued cases before the US Supreme Court) wrote a few weeks ago should serve as a template for every State governor and legislature that truly cares about liberty. See Ed's column at: http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin201.htm As Vieira says, the states should resurrect their militia. Many--if not all--states have the legal authority for such entities in their constitutions. In some states they are called the State Guard. Some plainly use the word "militia." Whatever they are called, they need to be activated. And all that is necessary for this to be accomplished is the order of the governor. It's that simple! And as Vieira said, states need to adopt an alternative currency--including, and most especially, gold and silver. In other words, they need to develop their own private economies, complete with their own banks and exchange mediums. They also need to reject the multinational agribusiness and develop their own in-State agricultural and energy businesses. I would dare say that the first State that determines to follow Vieira's sagacious counsel (and rumblings of this have already begun in states such as Alaska, Oklahoma, Texas, Montana, New Hampshire, Indiana, Tennessee, South Carolina, etc.) would have so many liberty-loving patriots flock there that its economy would explode with prosperity--resulting in a domino effect of many other states following suit--and the revolution that this country so desperately needs would indeed take place. Furthermore, such a revolution would be constitutional, lawful, moral, and, yes, in compliance with the laws of Nature and of Nature's God. In the meantime, is Barack Obama really worried about civil war? He might be. It is my observation that Washington politicians and bureaucrats are the most paranoid people on the planet. The problem is--as with most power-hungry Machiavellians--their paranoia often translates into more oppression and less liberty for the citizenry. And if this is true, it simply means that the states need to hurry up and do what needs to be done! *If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link: http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php |
| UNCOVERED: Obama's Campaign
Benefited from Illegal Alien Union Dues ! Fellow Patriot, Why are we not surprised?! Barack Obama and his leftist administration have refused to officially close the loophole in ObamaCare on health care for illegal aliens. Obama refuses to effectively secure the borders. And now he's promising a massive amnesty bill in early 2010! Why? Now we know . . . Recently uncovered video footage shows officials from SEIU--one of the largest and most aggressive labor unions in the country--admitting that many of their union members are illegal aliens. And as members of SEIU, illegal alien workers pay union dues!!! STOP THE POLITICAL CORRUPTION! BLAST-FAX CONGRESS NOW! Eliseo Medina, Executive Vice President of SEIU, revealed, "SEIU is the largest union of immigrant workers in the country. A number of them are 'undocumented' [illegal]." We already know about SEIU's undue influence on the Obama Administration. As many at Fox News have uncovered, Obama's ties to ACORN and SEIU are more than just a mere acquaintance. During the 2008 presidential campaigns, SEIU joined ACORN in spending millions of dollars in union dues to pay over 3,000 workers to campaign in battleground states and over 100,000 of their members knocking on doors and making phone calls for Barack Obama!!! In fact, Barack Obama, SEIU, and ACORN are joined at the hip, and Obama is hell-bent on executing their socialist agenda. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! BLAST-FAX CONGRESS NOW ! So, it comes as no surprise at all that Obama is pushing a radical agenda of blanket amnesty and easy access to free health care for illegal aliens. He has been bought by illegal aliens' union dues and is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of SEIU and ACORN!!! SEIU has been at the forefront of support for Obama's socialist agenda and has spent untold fortunes promoting amnesty, government health care, nationalization of banks and other corporations, massive tax increases, and the list goes on. We MUST NOT stand for this corruption! Minuteman PAC is demanding a full investigation by the Congress into illegal campaign donations and blatant violation of federal immigration law by SEIU officials. In the video footage we see Barack Obama celebrating with SEIU thugs and pledging to "paint the nation purple with SEIU"> ... the color of SEIU's logo. Join us by blast-faxing the petition demanding an investigation now!!! We CANNOT let a our republican form of government continue its slide into kleptocratic control by special interest socialists! It's your country! Take it back! We're continuing to monitor this story and the development of investigations. And that's why we need your help to keep the pressure on them ! HELP US INVESTIGATE OBAMA'S POLITICAL PAYOFF! Stand with us and help us send a clarion call, a cry from the patriot American heart, to Congress that this disgusting display of political corruption WILL NOT BE TOLERATED and WILL NOT BE FORGOTTEN in November of next year, NOR IN 2012 ! Brett Farley Executive Director Minuteman PAC |
|
Morning Bell: Obamacare is
Seriously
Unconstitutional
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/10/morning-bell-obamacare-is-seriously-unconstitutional/
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) disagrees. In 1994, the CBO said of an individual mandate to buy health insurance:
As much as Speaker Pelosi may wish otherwise, the CBO is dead on: the Supreme Court has never validated a federal power as intrusive as forcing all Americans to purchase a service due to their very existence. Sure, the Supreme Court has said that Congress may regulate a farmer’s production of wheat even if he never plans to distribute it off of his farm, and the Supreme Court has said Congress may ban the possession of Marijuana even if it is for personal use, but never before has the Supreme Court said the power to regulate commerce enabled Congress to force an individual to do something just because he existed. In fact, the Supreme Court has always been clear that the Commerce clause must have some limits. In United States v. Lopez (1995), the Court struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act, which attempted to reach the activity of possessing a gun within a thousand feet of a school. In United States v. Morrison, it invalidated part of the Violence Against Women Act, which regulated gender-motivated violence. In both cases, the Court found the regulated activity in each case to be noneconomic; it was outside the reach of Congress’s Commerce power, regardless of its effect on interstate commerce. The case for the constitutionality of the individual mandate is far weaker than either of these two cases. Congress was at least trying to regulate an individual’s activity in the cases above. But the mandate does not purport to regulate or prohibit activity of any kind, whether economic or noneconomic. To the contrary, it purports to “regulate” inactivity. If the individual mandate is Constitutional, then Congress could do anything. They could: require us to buy a new Chevy Impala each year to support the government-supported auto industry; require us to buy war bonds to pay for the Iraq and Afghan wars; require us to grow wheat (10 bushels each), or pay someone else to grow your share; require us to buy whatever they want. Many on the left immediately point to state mandates that drivers purchase car insurance as proof of a mandate that all Americans buy health insurance is not new. But car insurance mandates are distinguishable in at least four ways: 1) they are state requirements and states have broader constitutional authority than the federal government; 2) they apply to drivers only, not all Americans (e.g. passengers are not required to carry insurance); 3) drivers use public roads; 4) states only require drivers to insure against injury to other drivers, not to insure themselves against personal injury. Yesterday The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Legal and Judicial Studies released a Legal Memorandum written in conjunction with Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett and Nathaniel Stewart explaining: Why the Personal Mandate to Buy Health Insurance Is Unprecedented and Unconstitutional. Introducing the paper, Sen. Orrin Hatch noted:
Someone needs to explain this concept to Speaker Pelosi. Seriously. Quick Hits:
|